Thread (15 messages) flat view 15 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH resend] Do not create commits whose message contains NUL

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:37

On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 06:56:08PM +0700, Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy wrote:
We assume that the commit log messages are uninterpreted sequences of
non-NUL bytes (see Documentation/i18n.txt). However the assumption
does not really stand out and it's quite easy to set an editor to save
in a NUL-included encoding. Currently we silently cut at the first NUL
we see.

Make it more obvious that NUL is not welcome by refusing to create
such commits. Those who deliberately want to create them can still do
with hash-object.

Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <redacted>
---
 This is from UTF-16 in commit message discussion [1] a few months
 ago. I don't want to resurrect the discussion again. However I think
 it's a good idea to stop users from shooting themselves in this case,
 especially at porcelain level.

 There were no comments on this patch previously. So, any comments
 this time ? Should I drop it?
I think this is a sane thing to do. Having thought about and
experimented a little with utf-16 in the past few months, I really don't
see how you could be disrupting anybody's workflow. utf-16 messages get
butchered so badly already; we are much better off letting the user know
of the problem as soon as possible.

It looks like we already have a check for is_utf8, and this is not
failing that check. I guess because is_utf8 takes a NUL-terminated
buffer, so it simply sees the truncated result (i.e., depending on
endianness, "foo" in utf16 is something like "f\0o\0o\0", so we check
only "f"). We could make is_utf8 take a length parameter to be more
accurate, and then it would catch this.

However, I think that's not quite what we want. We only check is_utf8 if
the encoding field is not set. And really, we want to reject NULs no
matter _which_ encoding they've set, because git simply doesn't handle
them properly.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/commit.c b/commit.c
index d67b8c7..0775eec 100644
--- a/commit.c
+++ b/commit.c
@@ -855,6 +855,9 @@ int commit_tree(const char *msg, size_t msg_len, unsigned char *tree,
Hmm. My version of commit_tree does not have a "msg_len" parameter, nor
do I have d67b8c7. Is there some refactoring patch this is based on that
I missed?
+	if (strlen(msg) < msg_len)
+		die(_("cannot commit with NUL in commit message"));
+
Two nits:

  1. For some reason, checking strlen(msg) seems a subtle way of looking
     for NULs in a buffer. I would have found:

         if (memchr(msg, '\0', msglen))

     much more obvious. But perhaps it is just me. Certainly not a big
     deal either way.

  2. The error message could be a little friendlier. The likely reason
     for NULs is a bogus encoding setting in the user's editor. We
     already have a nice "your message isn't utf-8" message. Though it
     does suggest setting i18n.commitencoding, which probably _isn't_
     the solution here (since their encoding clearly isn't supported).
     But maybe it would be nicer to say something like:

       error: your commit message contains NUL characters.
       hint: This is often caused by using multibyte encodings such as
       hint: UTF-16. Please check your editor settings.

     We could even go further and detect some common NUL-containing
     encodings, but I don't think it's worth the effort.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
diff --git a/t/t3900/UTF-16.txt b/t/t3900/UTF-16.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..53296be684253f40964c0604be7fa7ff12e200cb
GIT binary patch
literal 32
mcmezOpWz6@X@-jo=NYasZ~@^#h9rjP3@HpR7}6Nh8Mpw;r3yp<
I was disappointed not to find a secret message. :)

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help