Re: [PATCH 3/4] pack-objects: don't traverse objects unnecessarily

Dan McGee [off-list ref] writes:

On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

I am not sure if this produces the identical result that was benchmarked
in the original series.

I was not either when I wrote the patch, and I had hoped to confirm
the results you showed in the message of 1b4bb16b9ec.

I actually am reasonably sure the result will not be identical, but I also
do not think it matters. The differences would appear only for entries
that have been filled earlier, which should be a minority.

unable to figure out how you generated those numbers so I wasn't able
to do so (and had planned to get back to you to find out how you made
those tables). Were you able to verify the ordering did not regress?

No; I was hoping you would redo the benchmark using 5f44324 (core: log
offset pack data accesses happened, 2011-07-06).