Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v2 00/12] Pulling signed/annotated tags

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:27

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
Here is what I had in mind....
And then I changed my mind again. Using a single SP indent for multi-line
header fields make things easy to view.

| tree 20009beb1d5d0494347db5afbe80b364563dd511
| parent 8457d13895251ebf2f839ee6f74dd0087fb56334
| parent 6486ca6d77eaf4109b26b70da0b3a0158868e22f
| author Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] 1320781099 -0800
| committer Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] 1320781099 -0800
| mergetag object 6486ca6d77eaf4109b26b70da0b3a0158868e22f
|  type commit
|  tag test-tag
|  tagger Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] 1320471226 -0700
|  
|  test merge
|  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|  Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
|  
|  iQIcBAABAgAGBQJOtMq7AAoJELC16IaWr+bLL30P/iEhPR+gkOpF09EshWZy7Vbu
|  ...
|  =eJX/
|  -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| 
| Merge tag 'test-tag' of ../git into HEAD
| 
| test merge

I am redoing the "signed-commit" series to also use this format.

The way I made the tag available to commit_tree() turned out to be a bit
too clever, by the way, and it would cause problems down the road when
these things need to be amended. Embedded "gpgsig" in a commit is about
the commit itself, and should not be carried over, but "mergetag" is about
the parent and should not be lost only because you wanted to fix a type
in your merge log message. I'll be redoing that part in the series and
hopefully the finished result would be ready for review after 1.7.8 final.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help