Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] pull: introduce a pull.rebase option to enable --rebase

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:23

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason  [off-list ref] writes:
This option will be considered at a lower priority than
branch.<name>.rebase, i.e. we could set pull.rebase=true and
branch.<name>.rebase=false and the latter configuration option would
win.

Reviewed-by: Sverre Rabbelier <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Fernando Vezzosi <redacted>
Reviewed-by: Eric Herman <redacted>
Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <redacted>
I see many reviewed-by lines, but what kind of review did this patch have,
exactly? It seem to break its own test (branch.to-rebase.rebase should
override pull.rebase).

I think I've queued most (if not all) of the patches in flight except for
Ram's sequencer reroll to 'pu' and pu^ passes the test but the tip of pu
does not due to this topic.

Thanks for other topics from the Amsterdam together, by the way. I did not
comment on them individually but they looked mostly reasonable from a
quick glance.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help