(off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] http.c: Use timeout suggested by curl instead of fixed 50ms timeout · Junio C Hamano <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] http.c: Use timeout suggested by curl instead of fixed 50ms timeout · Mika Fischer <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] http.c: Use timeout suggested by curl instead of fixed 50ms timeout · Jeff King <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] http.c: Use timeout suggested by curl instead of fixed 50ms timeout · Mika Fischer <hidden> · 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] http.c: Use timeout suggested by curl instead of fixed 50ms timeout

From: Mika Fischer <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:23

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

2016-06-15 · [PATCH v3 2/3] http.c: Use timeout suggested by curl instead of fixed 50ms timeout · Mika Fischer <hidden>
2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] http.c: Use timeout suggested by curl instead of fixed 50ms timeout · Junio C Hamano <hidden>

On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 18:51, Jeff King [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Ah yes, that's good. I would have done it this way in C++, but I
wasn't sure whether C99 is OK for git.

C99 is not OK. But this is not C99, as the conditional opens a new
block.

Oh I see, thanks for clarifying!