Re: [PATCH] http-push: don't always prompt for password
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:23
Stefan Naewe [off-list ref] writes:
http-push prompts for a password when the URL is set as 'https://user@host/repo' even though there is one set in ~/.netrc. Pressing ENTER at the password prompt succeeds then, but is a annoying and makes it almost useless in a shell script, e.g. Signed-off-by: Stefan Naewe <redacted> ---
Thanks.
With this the only callsite of init_curl_http_auth() becomes the one after
we get the 401 response, and this caller makes sure that user_name is not
NULL.
Do we still want "if (user_name)" inside init_curl_http_auth()?
I tried to rewrite the proposed commit log message to describe the real
issue, and here is what I came up with:
Author: Stefan Naewe [off-list ref]
Date: Fri Nov 4 08:03:08 2011 +0100
http: don't always prompt for password
When a username is already specified at the beginning of any HTTP
transaction (e.g. "git push https://user@hosting.example.com/project.git"
or "git ls-remote https://user@hosting.example.com/project.git"), the code
interactively asks for a password before calling into the libcurl library.
It is very likely that the reason why user included the username in the
URL is because the user knows that it would require authentication to
access the resource. Asking for the password upfront would save one
roundtrip to get a 401 response, getting the password and then retrying
the request. This is a reasonable optimization.
HOWEVER.
This is done even when $HOME/.netrc might have a corresponding entry to
access the site, or the site does not require authentication to access the
resource after all. But neither condition can be determined until we call
into libcurl library (we do not read and parse $HOME/.netrc ourselves). In
these cases, the user is forced to respond to the password prompt, only to
give a password that is not used in the HTTP transaction. If the password
is in $HOME/.netrc, an empty input would later let the libcurl layer to
pick up the password from there, and if the resource does not require
authentication, any input would be taken and then discarded without
getting used. It is wasteful to ask this unused information to the end
user.
Reduce the confusion by not trying to optimize for this case and always
incur roundtrip penalty. An alternative might be to document this and keep
this round-trip optimization as-is.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Naewe [off-list ref]
Helped-by: Jeff King [off-list ref]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano [off-list ref]
What is somewhat troubling is that after analyzing the root cause of the
issue, I am wondering if a more correct fix is to remove the user@ part
from the URL (in other words, document that a URL with an embedded
username will ask for password upfront, and tell the users that if they
have netrc entries or if they are accessing a resource that does not
require authentication, they should omit the username from the URL).