On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 00:45:58 +0200
Jeff King wrote:
[1] English is my first language, so it's rare for me to even step
outside of ASCII, let alone latin1. But aren't there some languages in
which utf-16 is more efficient than utf-8?
You sometimes hear something along the lines of the second
"disadvantage" listed in the article below, i.e. "Characters U+0800
through U+FFFF use three bytes in UTF-8, but only two in UTF-16.":
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTF-8#Disadvantages_4
--
Štěpán