Re: [PATCH] commit: teach --gpg-sign option
From: Michael J Gruber <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:13
Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 09.10.2011 23:22:
Michael J Gruber [off-list ref] writes:quoted
I just noticed that this format differs from the one of signed tags. What special reason is there for the "sig " indentation?Read the part of the message you are quoting.
I certainly did, and certainly did not find any mention. Do you think I would have asked otherwise? I'm trying to be helpful by testing out a patch in flight. That is: *I* am trying to be helpful. This
The lines of GPG detached signature are placed in new header lines, after the standard tree/parent/author/committer headers, instead of tucking the signature block at the end of the commit log message text (similar to how signed tag is done), for multiple reasons:
gave me the impression that commit signatures are done "similar to how signed tag is done". *After* doing several "cat-file" and after your insisting that you had described the "sig " indent I come to the conclusion that you implemented it this way "instead of... [doing it] similar to how signed tag is done". Before that, I misread those paragraphs (togetheter with the non-existing object format doc) to mean that have a section in the object which is ignored automatically, which is where tag signatures are (while in fact they are not) and where commit signatures will go. I have to say I dislike the fact that we would have different signature formats. But I have spent too much time on this unnecessarily already. Michael