On Friday, October 07, 2011 09:51:46 am Michael Haggerty
wrote:
I can't write more now, but Martin, if you have time to
benchmark 9944c7faf903a95d4ed9de284ace32debe21cdc1
against your repository, I would be very interested to
learn the results.
The fetch no longer seems to suffer from the large
regression, it is now faster (~7m) than 1.7.7 (which was
+15m).
As a quick note, if I comment out the
invalidate_cached_refs() call in write_ref_sha1() on line
2065 (on top of 9944c7), it is still much faster, only ~2m.
Perhaps growing the array on the fly with many refs is still
be too inefficient?
-Martin
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. which is a
member of Code Aurora Forum