Thread (15 messages) flat view 15 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 2/3] fetch: honor the user-provided refspecs when pruning refs

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:12

On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 06:37:13PM +0200, Carlos Martín Nieto wrote:
quoted
I assume you mean s/tag/branch/ in the last line?
Yeah, maybe ref would be better?
Yeah, agreed.
quoted
Tests?
Good point.
It sounds like you already have a reproduction recipe for this, and for
the --tags thing in the next commit.
OK, so take a step back and figure out what we want the rules to be
before we call get_stale_heads. It does sound like a more elegant
approach. I was trying to disrupt the callers as little as possible, but
then again, there's only two. Will change.
Yeah. Sometimes we try hard to make a minimal patch, because it makes it
easier to review. At the same time, I think it's more important to make
the code clean if it needs it. Especially when there aren't many callers
to disrupt.

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help