Thread (5 messages) flat view 5 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: Merge seems to overwrite unstaged local changes

From: Sebastian Schuberth <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:11

On 29.09.2011 15:07, Sebastian Schuberth wrote:
quoted
There recently have been quite a change in merge-recursive implementation
and it would be really nice if you can try this again with the tip of
'master' before 1.7.7 final ships.
The unstaged changes do not seem to get lost during the merge anymore
when using git version 1.7.7.rc3.4.g8d714 on Linux. I guess that
somewhat confirms that there's a bug in git<  1.7.7. I'll write a word
of warning to our in-house git users that they should always commit
before merging ...
It seems I'm not the only one who lost code due to this bug. For a more 
detailed analysis see this blog post:

http://benno.id.au/blog/2011/10/01/git-recursive-merge-broken

As it turns out, my use case also involves a rename of the file in which 
changes were lost. And just like for the blog's author it somewhat 
concerns me and shakes my confidence in Git for how long this severe bug 
slipped through undetected.

-- 
Sebastian Schuberth
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help