Re: git svn with non-standard svn layout
From: Phil Hord <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:06
On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 2:37 PM, Chris Harris [off-list ref] wrote:
I am using git version 1.7.6.4 built from the latest stable source on
github. Running Ubuntu with kernel 2.6.38-11-generic
I can't seem to git git svn to see my branches correctly.
Unfortunately my svn repository is not open source, so I can not post
it here, but I will try to explain my issue.
We use a non standard svn layout like the following
branches
V4.1
V4.1.0
V4.1.1
dev
dev is our trunk, and our branches have 2 levels.
I first use git init, then setup my config as follows
[svn-remote "svn"]
url = file:///home/chris/svnrepo
fetch = dev:refs/remotes/trunk
branches = branches/V4.1/{V4.1.1}:refs/remotes/branches/*
For this example I am just trying to make a single branch work.
After a fetch all revisions are ok. master correctly points to
remotes/trunk,but gitk shows the following:
o remotes/branches/V4.1.1
|
o some commit
|
|
| o master - remotes/trunk
| |
| o another commit
| /
|
etc
( sorry for the bad ascii art. )
My issue is that trunk ( master ) appears to be a branch from V4.1.1
instead of V4.1.1 being a branch from trunk ( master )In git's estimation, there is no difference between these two cases. Visually you may think there is a difference, but graphically (in the "network graph" sense of the word) they are exactly the same thing. Consider this history: o---o---A---B---C <== trunk \ D---E---F <== V4.1.1 Compare it to this "other" history: B---C <== trunk / o---o---A---D---E---F <== V4.1.1 You might say the first one looks "right" and the second one looks "wrong". But in fact, they are the same graph. They both say that B's parent is A and D's parent is A. B and D share a common ancestor at A. Here's another view: B---C <== trunk / o---o---A \ D---E---F <== V4.1.1 You may want to read this nice description of the DAG: http://eagain.net/articles/git-for-computer-scientists/
git log --graph shows the same structure. Any suggestions on how to configure this so git svn maps my non-standard layout correctly?
Try git log --graph --date-order to see a slightly different take on things. Phil