Re: [PATCH] ls-remote: a lone "-h" is asking for help

Heya,

On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 22:31, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

I am not opposed to. We should do the usual "start from warning and then
deprecate" dance, but I do not think we would want to have a "I want the
old behaviour, please keep it" configuration, especially if we are talking
about a big version bump like 2.0.

The first step would look something like this, on top of the previous
patch.

Makes sense.

I remember some sort of "this is for post 1.7.x" section in what's
cooking at some point. Should we have some way to queue patches like
this, or would someone have to resend after the appropriate release?

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier