Re: Fwd: [Survey] Signed push
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:52:02
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [Survey] Signed push · Shawn Pearce <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [Survey] Signed push · Sam Vilain <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: Fwd: [Survey] Signed push · Michael Haggerty <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [Survey] Signed push · Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: Fwd: [Survey] Signed push · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Philip Oakley [off-list ref] wrote:
Is one option to store the branch description (if any) on line two of the <branch name> file in .git\refs\heads.
Or even on line one.
We already basically do that for the magic FETCH_HEAD branch, and use
it to populate the merge commit. Extending that kind of thing to all
branches might be a nice idea.
Of course, then the question becomes "what about packed refs"? Do you
just leave the unpacked ref in place for those?
Linus