Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] Improved infrastructure for refname normalization

Michael Haggerty [off-list ref] writes:

OTOH I am again having serious doubts that trying to support
unnormalized refnames is a good idea.

Sorry, I am confused. I thought the way you are planning forward is to
leave unnormalized ones unchecked as the current code does (and mark the
places that do so with _unsafe()), with the eventual goal of fixing the
caller to pass only normalized ones to make call to the "safe" version?