On Fri, Sep 09, 2011 at 09:40:59PM +0200, Michael J Gruber wrote:
+test_expect_success 'git branch -v t should work' '
+ git branch -v t &&
+ test .git/refs/heads/t &&
test -f ?
Also, don't we have test_path_is_file which yields slightly prettier
output (and maybe some portability benefits; I don't remember)?
+ git branch -d t &&
+ test ! -f .git/refs/heads/t
Ditto for 'test_path_is_missing' here.
-Peff