Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [BUG] git bisect start fails when stale bisect data is left behind

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:51:59

Joel Kaasinen [off-list ref] writes:
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 19:38, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I do not necessarily think this is a bug to begin with --- the user had a
bad state, and bisect stopped without doing further damage.
Oh, actually my git-bisect man page says:

"""
   Bisect reset
       After a bisect session, to clean up the bisection state and return to
       the original HEAD, issue the following command:

           $ git bisect reset

       By default, this will return your tree to the commit that was checked
       out before git bisect start. (A new git bisect start will also do that,
       as it cleans up the old bisection state.)
"""

The parenthetical sentence seems to imply that a bisect start cleans
out the old state. The problem is that the cleaning fails when the
state is bad. (Try e.g. "git bisect start; git bisect start a b" where
a and b are valid refs.)

It's pretty much the same to me how this gets resolved. I'm fine with
a more verbose error message from bisect start.
I do not think anybody minds "a more verbose" message. I do mind if the
suggestion the message makes were "wrong". That is what I was questioning.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help