Re: [RFC/PATCH] attr: map builtin userdiff drivers to well-known extensions
From: Eric Sunshine <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:51:55
On 08/25/2011 05:06 PM, Jeff King wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 05:00:51PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:quoted
quoted
Also, any other extensions that would go into such a list? I have no idea what the common extension is for something like pascal or csharp.C# uses extension ".cs". ".cpp" is common, in fact often required, by Windows compilers.Thanks, added both to my list.
To clarify, I meant to say that for C++, .cpp is common/required on Windows.
quoted
What about ".h" and ".hpp"?How well do our cpp patterns do with header files? I imagine they're better than the default, but I don't think I've ever really tried anything tricky.
I scanned through a number of revisions for one of my long-running C++
projects comparing the diff of header files with and without "*.h
diff=cpp". In some header files in this project, the oft-used C++
keywords public:, protected:, and private: appear at start-of-line. In
such cases, the default diff emits a less-than-useful hunk header:
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ public:
whereas, "diff=cpp" emits:
@@ -19,8 +19,8 @@ class Foobar
-- ES