Re: How to check out the repository at a particular point in time

On 08/23/2011 05:54 PM, Michael Witten wrote:

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 15:18, R. Diez[off-list ref]  wrote:

quoted

quoted

The main problem is that your request is not very
well-defined: in
nonlinear history there will in general be more than one
commit at the
time requested.

     ---a----b----c----M----  (M is a merge)
         \            /
          d-----e----f

              ^----April 1st

Suppose you ask git for "the newest commit as of April 1st"
in this history.  Is it supposed to give you b or d?

I still don't quite understand how git works, but let me
risk a naive statement here. If "a-b-c-M" were 'master',
and "d-e-f" were 'new-feature', then on April 1st the
current version on 'master' is 'b', because I merged the
'new-feature' branch at a later point in time. Does that
make sense?

O! for the love all that is Holy!

You see, guys? The term `branch' was a TERRIBLE choice.

What git calls `branch master' in your example is just a pointer to
the commit object `M'; it has nothing to do with particular lineages
like `a-b-c-M'.

Back in 2005 when git was young and fresh, there was a discussion about
what to call things. If memory serves (which it might not), I think
the consensus was that "branch" works just fine, and when someone who
doesn't like it comes along we can just tell them that it's short for
"tip-of-branch pointer", which is far more accurate. A "ref" is always
local though, which is why the reflog (which is used for such date
resolving problems) is never even considered to work on remote refs.
They *can* work on remotes' refs though, which is a slightly different
thing.

Whatever, really. The fact that pretty much everyone seems to know
what a branch is and how it works in git after a (very) brief intro
to it means it's either right on target or that people are so used to
the fact that branch means something different in every scm that they
don't even bother loading the word with some preconceived notion that
used to be right in cvs.

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231

Considering the successes of the wars on alcohol, poverty, drugs and
terror, I think we should give some serious thought to declaring war
on peace.