Jeff King venit, vidit, dixit 04.08.2011 06:06:
On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 07:17:38PM +0200, Michael Schubert wrote:
quoted
@@ -297,6 +298,9 @@ static int append_ref(const char *refname, const unsigned char *sha1, int flags,
if ((kind & ref_list->kinds) == 0)
return 0;
+ if (cb->remote && strncmp(cb->remote, refname, strlen(cb->remote)))
+ return 0;
+
This isn't right. You are assuming that a remote called "foo" will have
all of its branches in refs/remotes/foo. That's true under the default
configuration, but technically speaking, the remote tracking branches of
"foo" are defined by the right-hand side of foo's fetch refspecs.
You are 100% right here, but...
So I think you want something more like this:
...the op still might want to filter simply by the remote name.
Reminds me that I have to resurrect my patterns-with-branches series....
Michael