Re: [PATCH 5/6] sequencer: Expose API to cherry-picking machinery

Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:

Another thought.  I wonder if it's possible to leave
sequencer_parse_args() private to builtin/revert.c, making the split
a little more logical:

 - the builtin takes responsibility for its commandline interface
 - the library takes over once the builtin has figured out what the
   user wanted.

That's a very natural separation of tasks.