Re: [PATCH] Support specific color for a specific remote branches

On 8 August 2011 21:08, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

Who said a remote name is terminated with (and cannot contain) a slash?

...

Shouldn't this code be consulting the configuration file to learn the

...

so that remote branches from "frotz" remote, that happen to be stored
under refs/remotes/nitfol/ hierarchy, are painted in the correct color?

Sorry, that's too dip & complex for me... Consider this patch 'withdrawn' then.

-- Aviv