Re: [PATCH 17/18] revert: Introduce --continue to continue the operation

Hi Junio,

Junio C Hamano writes:

Ramkumar Ramachandra [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Junio: Here's another small fixup patch for your convenience.

Not very convenient I am afraid ;-)

Hm, I actually thought about this a bit.  Due to the volume of patches
you have to pick up and apply from emails everyday, I figured that you
must have optimized your email-patch application pipeline to such a
ridiculous extent that it's probably faster for you to apply patches
than even typing out a word.  A quick interactive rebase with
autosquash will then fix rr/revert-cherry-pick-continue, no?

quoted

--8<--

This seems to be too short for "am -c"; have you tried applying it
yourself first before sending it out?

No, I haven't tried this.  Will try it and patch "am -c" if necessary,
because I like this minimal scissor (picked it up from Jonathan I
think).

quoted

-test_expect_success '--signoff is not automatically propogated to
resolved conflict' '
+test_expect_success '--signoff is not automatically propagated to
resolved conflict' '

Linewrapped.

Ugh.  Classic GMail web interface mistake.  I sometimes risk sending
small patches without git-send-email, and this is what happens.
Nothing helps: mutt's single-threaded'ness is starting to get on my
nerves now.

I'll squash this manually, so no need to resend. Thanks.

Thanks.

-- Ram