On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:46 PM, Jon Seymour [off-list ref] wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Christian Couder
[off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
On Tuesday 02 August 2011 16:41:13 Jon Seymour wrote:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Christian Couder
If I was to do this, I'd prefer to change uses of $BISECT_MODE with a
call to a function bisect_mode() that does the same thing.
Yeah, I think it would be a good idea to have a bisect_mode() function.
I don't like very much to blindly call some code when we might not need it.
Mmmm.
Actually, there is a neater way to do this.
I'll such use the existence of BISECT_HEAD to inform the
implementation of bisect_mode().
This avoids the need for a separate .git/BISECT_MODE file.
jon.