Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] push: Add the --no-recurse-submodules option

From: Jens Lehmann <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:51:41

Am 28.07.2011 22:05, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
Fredrik Gustafsson [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
diff --git a/transport.h b/transport.h
index 161d724..c6ccf8c 100644
--- a/transport.h
+++ b/transport.h
@@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ struct transport {
 #define TRANSPORT_PUSH_MIRROR 8
 #define TRANSPORT_PUSH_PORCELAIN 16
 #define TRANSPORT_PUSH_SET_UPSTREAM 32
+#define TRANSPORT_PUSH_NO_RECURSE_SUBMODULES 64
Also naming the constant with NO will invite an unnecessary double
negation, like this:

	if (!(flags & FROTZ_NO_NITFOL))
        	do_nitfol_to_frotz();
Right, we'll drop the "NO_" from that constant.
Besides, I would be moderately annoyed if this check were the default.
We will skip the check for submodules without remotes, does that lessen
your annoyance? We still think it is a good idea to have that test enabled
by default, but it might be a good idea to wait with that until we provide
a central config option to enable users to turn that off with a simple
"git config push.recurseSubmodules off". What do you think?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help