Hi Junio,
On Sun, 24 Jul 2011, Junio C Hamano wrote:
Sverre Rabbelier [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
... In the next commit this will be changed in order to make sure that
'master..master' does export master.
Sorry, but you need to be much more clear why this could be a good
thing.
Maybe we should have written 'master^0..master' or 'blub..blah' where
'blah' points to the same commit as 'blub'.
The problem is that we need to be able to tell which _ref_ is
uninteresting, not which _commit_, since one and the same commit can be
referenced by an uninteresting and an interesting ref.
Hopefully you will excuse our being a little incoherent after a codathon,
Dscho