On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 12:33:27PM +1200, Chris Packham wrote:
quoted
I'm not clear on what makes "B" more special than "A" in the graph
above. But assuming you know A, don't you just want:
What makes A special in this case is that commits up to and including
A have been reviewed, regression tested etc. My use-case is really
about telling people what has been worked on since the last time the
code was reviewed.
OK, that makes sense.
quoted
git log --no-merges topic ^upstream ^A
? That is, "everything in topic, but not in upstream, nor in the parent
of A". Or if you know A and not B, you can use "^B^!" (which means "do
not include commits that are in any parent of B").
Brilliant, that's exactly what I wanted. Thanks.
Oops, I mis-stated it above. It would be "everything in topic, but not
in upstream, nor in A". Which I think is what you actually want (I had
originally written it as "^B^!", but forgot to change the text when I
switched it to the more-readable "^A").
-Peff