Re: [RFC/PATCHv2 1/6] decorate: allow storing values instead of pointers
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:51:35
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [RFC/PATCHv2 1/6] decorate: allow storing values instead of pointers · Jonathan Nieder <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [RFC/PATCHv2 1/6] decorate: allow storing values instead of pointers · Jeff King <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [RFC/PATCHv2 1/6] decorate: allow storing values instead of pointers · Jeff King <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · [RFC/PATCHv2 1/6] decorate: allow storing values instead of pointers · Jeff King <hidden>
Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:
Doing macro meta-programming like this makes me feel a little dirty, but I actually think the result is more readable. [1/3]: implement generic key/value map [2/3]: fast-export: use object to uint32 map instead of "decorate" [3/3]: decorate: use "map" for the underlying implementation What do you think?
Yeah, dirty but nice ;-)