Hello,
2011-06-22 (수), 22:35 -0700, Junio C Hamano:
Namhyung Kim [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
$GIT_DIR/remotes/<name>/HEAD should be
$GIT_DIR/refs/remotes/<name>/HEAD.
Signed-off-by: Namhyung Kim <redacted>
---
Obviously correct; thanks.
There is another questionable one you did not touch, though.
With `-t <branch>` option, instead of the default glob
refspec for the remote to track all branches under
`$GIT_DIR/remotes/<name>/`, a refspec to track only `<branch>`
is created. You can give more than one `-t <branch>` to track
multiple branches without grabbing all branches.
The above says "$GIT_DIR/remotes/<name>/", but it should say
... all branches under refs/remotes/<name>/ namespace,...
Oh, I didn't aware of that. Will send v2 soon.
Also we should try to see if we can come up with a way to say the things
the part your patch touched describe _without_ mentioning $GIT_DIR at
all. "Store in $GIT_DIR/refs/$X" talks too much about the implementation
detail that the ref in question is implemented as a loose ref. We would
pack it into a single entry in $GIT_DIR/packed-refs file when we run gc,
and at that point "$GIT_DIR/refs/$X" is no longer a correct description.
I see. But I think it is a different issue and should be treated by
another patch(es). Just omitting $GIT_DIR is not enough? I don't know :)
Thanks.
--
Regards,
Namhyung Kim