Thread (14 messages) flat view 14 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: Using Transifex in git.git

From: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:51:29

On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 11:37, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] wrote:

To clarify a bit. I think it'd be great if we can get more
translations through any scheme possible.

However, I'd personally prefer if this was delayed a bit until the
outstanding po/*.po patches I have have landed in master. I already
have those locally ready for submission, I'm just going to submit them
after my current series hits master.

The timeline on that is entirely dependent on when Junio merges my
patches down.

But that's just my 0.02c. I don't think I own i18n in any way, so if
someone wants to set up some web ui, gather PO files, and submit them
that's great. More power to them.
 * Any way of editing the translations will have to comply with git's
 normal patch submission process.
Also, I just mentioned this because those are our existing patch
submission guidelines, which I thought would be reasonable to assume
would be the same in this case. Whether we observe this I think would
be something for the maintainer to answer.

Personally I think signed-off-by is silly, and wouldn't mind if we got
new translations in one giant commit with a crappy commit message, but
I didn't make the rules.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help