Re: [PATCH] remote: allow "-t" with fetch mirrors

On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 05:26:14PM +0200, Johannes Sixt wrote:

Am 5/26/2011 17:11, schrieb Jeff King:

quoted

+	if (mirror && !(mirror & MIRROR_FETCH) && track.nr)
+		die("specifying branches to track makes no sense with non-fetch mirrors");

Don't proliferate no double negation. How about:

+		die("specifying branches to track makes sense only with fetch mirrors");

I can't fail to not disagree with your logic.

Junio, can you squash it in?

-Peff