Re: [PATCH 0/2] gitweb: Improve handling of configuration files

"J.H." [off-list ref] writes:

I would argue against this, for a couple of reasons:

1) Git itself treats /etc/git.conf in this exact manor,...
Case in point turning on things like updateserverinfo, or automatic packing.

If we read both from the beginning of time it would have been more
convenient, and I agree with that 100%. So this is not a valid reason to
"argue against this".

2) Trying to get people to do includes in their config files, or to
completely ignore the system wide config isn't a sustainable practice.

I also agree with this.

In any case, I do not think we have to choose between Jakub's two patches.