On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 9:39 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Nguyen Thai Ngoc Duy [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:30 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
One typical use of a large binary file is to hold a sparse on-disk hash
table with a lot of holes. Help preserving the holes with lseek().
Should that be done only with big enough holes? Random zeros may
increase the number of syscalls unnecessarily.
I think that is a valid concern, but doesn't the code do that already?
Ahh I see you only increase kept when the the whole buf is zero. I was
looking for an explicit threshold, but it's implicitly the buffer
size. Sorry for the noise.
--
Duy