Hi Jonathan,
Jonathan Nieder writes:
Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
quoted
--- a/builtin/revert.c
+++ b/builtin/revert.c
@@ -35,17 +35,27 @@ static const char * const cherry_pick_usage[] = {
NULL
};
-static int edit, no_replay, no_commit, mainline, signoff, allow_ff;
-static enum { REVERT, CHERRY_PICK } action;
-static int commit_argc;
-static const char **commit_argv;
-static int allow_rerere_auto;
+static struct {
+ enum { REVERT, CHERRY_PICK } action;
That would require giving this struct a name, so it can be passed
around. Not a bad idea anyway imho since then a person reading
top-to-bottom is not left in suspense:
struct cherry_pick_opts {
enum { REVERT, CHERRY_PICK } action;
unsigned edit:1;
unsigned no_replay:1;
...
};
Thanks. A couple of nits:
1. You can't take the address of a bitfield, so 'edit' and 'replay'
can't be passed to the command line argument parsing framework
directly.
2. GCC throws a "warning: useless storage class specifier in empty
declaration" for this kind of declaration.
-- Ram