Thread (6 messages) flat view 6 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 1/2] commit: do not cleanup template

From: Sebastian Schuberth <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:51:11

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On 07.05.2011 22:13, Junio C Hamano wrote:
My gut feeling is that it is relatively easy to justify [1/2]. We prepare
the message file to be edited by the committer in sb by reading from
different message sources, and usually we would want to clean up what is
in sb before writing it out, but you may want to enforce a particular
format by using the template (such as having a leading whitespace) and the
way to tweak and fix that appearance should be by editing the template,
not by automatically running stripspace() here [*1*] when the message came
from the template.
FYI, Boris' patch pretty much matches the one I proposed back in [1] (or the slightly improved version in [2]). My commit message gives additional reasoning why whitespace in general should not be stripped from templates. IIRC, the only reason my patch was not accepted back then was that I was too lazy to write a test against it.

[1] http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/git/2010/3/10/25306
[2] http://repo.or.cz/w/git/mingw/4msysgit.git/commitdiff/39228f1b8af3eb6a6108c4fabf398d23a97a5993

-- 
Sebastian Schuberth
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help