Re: [PATCH 1/2] tests: eliminate unnecessary setup test assertions

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

I think multiple -L is not quite enough. I want a single "-L" that
matches every instance of a pattern, like:

  -L "/ ()/,+0"

Of course I am aware that needs to be a part of the multiple -L topic;
after all I was the one who invented -L "$regexp" support ;-)