Re: What's cooking in git.git (May 2011, #02; Wed, 4)

Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Rerolled.  Waiting for comments.

Should I extract first two commits i.e.

   - Remove gitweb/gitweb.cgi and other legacy targets from main Makefile
   - git-instaweb: Simplify build dependency on gitweb

into a separate patch series?  Even though their existence was
...
I think this cleanup is worthy on its own.

Sounds like a good idea.  Thanks.

quoted

* jn/ctags (2011-04-29) 6 commits
 - gitweb: Optional grouping of projects by category
 - gitweb: Modularized git_get_project_description to be more generic
 - gitweb: Split git_project_list_body in two functions
 - gitweb: Mark matched 'ctag' / contents tag (?by_tag=foo)
 - gitweb: Change the way "content tags" ('ctags') are handled
 - gitweb: Restructure projects list generation

Waiting for comments.

Should I do and post benchmarks for

   - gitweb: Restructure projects list generation

change (when 'forks' feature is used)?

Note that "gitweb: Mark matched 'ctag' / contents tag (?by_tag=foo)"
has ACK from Petr Baudis ('pasky').

... meaning the first three in the series?  I missed that.  Thanks for a
reminder.