Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:
With ebec842 (run-command: prettify -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE workaround,
2011-03-16) reverted, I still don't get complaints from -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE
for run-command.c (but I do get "ignoring return value of 'fwrite' from
many places). Perhaps the kinds of checks done by versions of gcc you,
Jonathan and I use are different.
It's not about fortify warnings, but "set but not used" warnings.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."