Re: [PATCHv2 3/3] Teach --dirstat to not completely ignore rearranged lines within a file

Johan Herland [off-list ref] writes:

I still feel that a file with 1000 rearranged lines should somehow count 
"more" than a file with only 1 rearranged line,...

I think that is just entirely a different mode of operation.  I do not
think it is wrong to have an alternative implementation of the dirstat
damage counter that is based on numstat code.

It may end up counting the damage slower than the current code, and more
importantly it will count a different kind of damage than the current code
does, so we may probably want to make it an optional feature.