Junio C Hamano wrote:
Kevin Cernekee [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
It's just a matter of personal preference, but I would find this
regexp slightly easier to read:
+ ($tz =~ m/^([+\-])([0-9]{2})([0-9]{2})$/);
I'd say "^([-+])(\d\d)(\d\d)$" makes it the most clear.
But what does 'digit character' mean? Is "\d" Unicode-aware, because
if it is it might match other digits than 0-9?
#perl says:
<rindolf> ShadeHawk: hi.
<rindolf> ShadeHawk: \d matches Unicode digits in unicode contexts I think.
<rindolf> ShadeHawk: like the ones used for Written Arabic.
<rindolf> ShadeHawk: let's see.
<rindolf> perlbot: eval: ["٣" =~ /\d/ ? "Match" : "Nomatch"]
<perlbot> rindolf: ["Match"]
<rindolf> Yay!
<rindolf> That's three in http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hindu%E2%80%93Arabic_numeral_system
Anyway gitweb uses \d in various regexps, so it shouldn't be worse
than it is now.
[...]
Care to re-roll the patch?
Will do.
--
Jakub Narebski
ShadeHawk on #git and #perl
Poland