Re: [PATCHv3 0/5]rev-list and friends: --min-parents, --max-parents

Jeff King [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Junio, please let me/us know whether sending an amended series in this way
(which I've seen before) is actually convenient for you or not. !squash
commits require a message edit, for example. OTOH, I don't know any (other?)
good inter diff solution.

As a reviewer, I find it is usually most convenient to just have the
submitter do the squash, and then write below the "---" (or in a cover
letter like this) a brief explanation of the differences.

Yeah, I end up reading the whole patch again, including bits I already
read, but that is probably a good thing. A good patch is hopefully not
too long, and it is easier (to me, anyway) to review it as a whole and
not as an interdiff.

Yes.  And that would also make it easier for people who didn't read the
earlier round to double check.