Thread (1 message) 1 message, 1 author, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 1/2] diff/status: refactor opportunistic index update

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:50:50

Piotr Krukowiecki [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:16 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
+void update_index_if_able(struct index_state *istate, struct lock_file *lockfile)
+{
+       if (istate->cache_changed) &&
+           !write_index(istate, lockfile->fd))
Mismatched parenthesis? Should be sth like

+       if (istate->cache_changed &&
+           !write_index(istate, lockfile->fd))
Yeah, "rebase -i" gotcha.  Applying [2/2] should get rid of it anyway.
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help