Jay Soffian wrote:
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
This series in 'pu' seems to break t3404#16.
Sorry for the breakage, I was running the test suite piecemeal and
must've not run that test (which was dumb of me).
I made the same mistake, too. Sorry for the trouble.
I'll figure out
what's going on and re-roll with Jonathan's t3507 improvements as
well.
FWIW (probably you noticed, but just in case) I imagine the t3507
improvements should go as a separate patch, since their main effect
is to clean up existing tests.