Thread (15 messages) flat view 15 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH v2] Introduce CHERRY_PICK_HEAD

From: Jonathan Nieder <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:50:34
Subsystem: the rest · Maintainer: Linus Torvalds

Jay Soffian wrote:
When a cherry-pick conflicts git advises to use:

 $ git commit -c <original commit id>

to preserve the original commit message and authorship. Instead, let's
record the original commit id in CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and advise to use:

  $ git commit -c CHERRY_PICK_HEAD

In the next commit, we teach git to handle the '-c CHERRY_PICK_HEAD'
part. Note that we record CHERRY_PICK_HEAD even in the case where there
are no conflicts so that we may use it to communicate authorship to
commit; this will then allow us to remove set_author_ident_env from
revert.c.
This "In the next commit" phrasing is dangerous, since a person can
build on top of your first commit at any time. :)  I would say:

	A later patch will teach "git commit" without -c to use
	CHERRY_PICK_HEAD to set the authorship automatically. Note
	that[...]

[...]
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
+++ b/builtin/revert.c
@@ -263,6 +279,11 @@ static void print_advice(void)
 
 	if (msg) {
 		fprintf(stderr, "%s\n", msg);
+		/*
+		 * rebase interactive takes care of the authorship
+		 * when the user invokes rebase --continue
+		 */
+		unlink(git_path("CHERRY_PICK_HEAD"));
Nit: GIT_CHERRY_PICK_HELP is not just for rebase --interactive but
for arbitrary porcelain that wants to take care of the commit itself
(see v1.5.4-rc0~106^2~1, revert/cherry-pick: Allow overriding the
help text by the calling Porcelain, 2007-11-28).

The conservative thing to do is indeed to remove CHERRY_PICK_HEAD in
this case, I suppose.  But I'd like to have the CHERRY_PICK_HEAD to
get the --amend safety when rebasing.  I can send a separate patch
for it if you'd like.
quoted hunk ↗ jump to hunk
--- a/t/t3507-cherry-pick-conflict.sh
+++ b/t/t3507-cherry-pick-conflict.sh
@@ -11,6 +11,12 @@ test_description='test cherry-pick and revert with conflicts
[...]
+test_expect_success 'failed cherry-pick sets CHERRY_PICK_HEAD' '
Some more tests.  Yes, they are repetitive.  A patch on top to factor
out the setup into a function might help, but that feels out of scope
here.

With whatever subset of the below looks good,
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <redacted>

Thanks.
---
 t/t3507-cherry-pick-conflict.sh |  116 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 116 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/t/t3507-cherry-pick-conflict.sh b/t/t3507-cherry-pick-conflict.sh
index fd569c8..ea52720 100755
--- a/t/t3507-cherry-pick-conflict.sh
+++ b/t/t3507-cherry-pick-conflict.sh
@@ -78,6 +78,122 @@ test_expect_success 'failed cherry-pick sets CHERRY_PICK_HEAD' '
 	test_cmp_rev picked CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
 '
 
+test_expect_success 'successful cherry-pick does not set CHERRY_PICK_HEAD' '
+
+	git checkout -f initial^0 &&
+	git read-tree -u --reset HEAD &&
+	git clean -d -f -f -q -x &&
+
+	git update-index --refresh &&
+	git diff-index --exit-code HEAD &&
+
+	git cherry-pick base &&
+
+	test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'cherry-pick --no-commit sets CHERRY_PICK_HEAD' '
+
+	git checkout -f initial^0 &&
+	git read-tree -u --reset HEAD &&
+	git clean -d -f -f -q -x &&
+
+	git update-index --refresh &&
+	git diff-index --exit-code HEAD &&
+
+	git cherry-pick --no-commit base &&
+
+	test_cmp_rev base CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'GIT_CHERRY_PICK_HELP suppresses CHERRY_PICK_HEAD' '
+
+	git checkout -f initial^0 &&
+	git read-tree -u --reset HEAD &&
+	git clean -d -f -f -q -x &&
+
+	git update-index --refresh &&
+	git diff-index --exit-code HEAD &&
+
+	(
+		GIT_CHERRY_PICK_HELP="and then do something else" &&
+		export GIT_CHERRY_PICK_HELP &&
+		test_must_fail git cherry-pick picked
+	) &&
+
+	test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'git reset clears CHERRY_PICK_HEAD' '
+
+	git checkout -f initial^0 &&
+	git read-tree -u --reset HEAD &&
+	git clean -d -f -f -q -x &&
+
+	git update-index --refresh &&
+	git diff-index --exit-code HEAD &&
+
+	test_must_fail git cherry-pick picked &&
+	git reset &&
+
+	test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'failed commit does not clear CHERRY_PICK_HEAD' '
+
+	git checkout -f initial^0 &&
+	git read-tree -u --reset HEAD &&
+	git clean -d -f -f -q -x &&
+
+	git update-index --refresh &&
+	git diff-index --exit-code HEAD &&
+
+	test_must_fail git cherry-pick picked &&
+	test_must_fail git commit &&
+
+	test_cmp_rev picked CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'cancelled commit does not clear CHERRY_PICK_HEAD' '
+
+	git checkout -f initial^0 &&
+	git read-tree -u --reset HEAD &&
+	git clean -d -f -f -q -x &&
+
+	git update-index --refresh &&
+	git diff-index --exit-code HEAD &&
+
+	test_must_fail git cherry-pick picked &&
+	echo resolved >foo &&
+	git add foo &&
+	git update-index --refresh -q &&
+	test_must_fail git diff-index --exit-code HEAD &&
+	(
+		GIT_EDITOR=false &&
+		export GIT_EDITOR &&
+		test_must_fail git commit
+	) &&
+
+	test_cmp_rev picked CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
+'
+
+test_expect_success 'successful commit clears CHERRY_PICK_HEAD' '
+
+	git checkout -f initial^0 &&
+	git read-tree -u --reset HEAD &&
+	git clean -d -f -f -q -x &&
+
+	git update-index --refresh &&
+	git diff-index --exit-code HEAD &&
+
+	test_must_fail git cherry-pick picked &&
+	echo resolved >foo &&
+	git add foo &&
+	git commit &&
+
+	test_must_fail git rev-parse --verify CHERRY_PICK_HEAD
+'
+
 test_expect_success 'failed cherry-pick produces dirty index' '
 
 	git checkout -f initial^0 &&
-- 
1.7.4.1
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help