Re: non-empty index with git commit -a

Heya,

On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 03:20, Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] wrote:

If I remember the discussion[1] correctly, by requiring a separate
add -u step (or commit -f -a) if the "I don't trust my fingers"
configuration is enabled.

That would definitely work for me. The question then is, should git
consider the index precious by default, or not? That is, should that
value default to true in 1.8?

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier