Re: Consistent terminology: cached/staged/index

Miles Bader [off-list ref] writes:

Er...?

Here we were talking about using "-s" (inspired by "--staged"), which
I suggested because you earlier objected to "-c"...

Not _we were_, but _you_ were.

I actually was hoping that it was obvious that -s is a no-starter from the
messages so far in this thread, as neither --cached nor its more
descriptive spelling --index-only has character 's' anywhere in it, and we
have been keeping --staged as a low-key synonym for a reason.