On Wed, Feb 2, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Vincent Hanquez [off-list ref] wrote:
On 01/02/11 22:48, J.H. wrote:
quoted
The wiki will almost universally have a "central site" no matter what
the backend. Personally I see little advantage to having a git backed
wiki myself.
with git based wiki, you can clone the whole wiki on your local machine, and
read/edit/commit on it locally using standard editor tool (i.e. $EDITOR).
and the history/revision/diff is completely built-in.
But there's no git based wiki (or any other wiki) that has even a
fraction of the features that MediaWiki has, or IMO a markup format
similarly sane.
--
Felipe Contreras