Thread (3 messages) flat view 3 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jan 2011, #06; Sun, 30)

From: Sverre Rabbelier <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:50:28

Heya,

On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 06:53, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
1.7.4 is out. I'd like to stop and calm the tree down for a few days
so that we can catch any brown-paper-bag bugs before moving things
forward, and then open the floodgate for the next cycle, which I am
inclined to designate as "We would have done these differently if we
were creating git from scratch with the experience we have and wisdom
we have gained" cycle, allowing minor backward incompatibilities,
somewhat like 1.6.0 but not so drastic.  The result would probably
be called 1.8.0--the details in a separate message.
Nice, is this based on the topics that are currently cooking, or on
people having indicated an intent to submit such patches?



Now that we're past 1.7.4., perhaps it's time to resurrect a dead
thread. From a past "What's cooking":

On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 03:20, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 09:34, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Needs a bit more minor work to get the basic code structure right.
And I'm still not sure (see earlier replies to "What's Cooking" posts)
what needs to be done to make it better.
One open question was why you do not want to move 'LIB_OBJS += gettext.o'
away from the LIB_OBJS section down to the configuration evaluation
section, i.e., why gettext.o would be different from block-sha1/sha1.o.
Ævar, you didn't respond to that message. Junio, do I understand
correctly that if this problem is addressed the topic is ready to be
merged to next?

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help