Thread (8 messages) flat view 8 messages, 4 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: Can't find the revelant commit with git-log

From: René Scharfe <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:50:28

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

Am 29.01.2011 03:34, schrieb René Scharfe:
Am 29.01.2011 01:02, schrieb Junio C Hamano:
quoted
Let's look at the original code before your patch again.

 1. If all the parents of a commit are the same, we will see (tree_same &&
    !tree_changed), so we get TREESAME.

 2. If some but not all of the parents are the same, we will see (tree_same
    && tree_changed), and we end up getting TREESAME.

 3. If none of the parents is the same, (!tree_same && tree_changed) holds
    true, and we do not get TREESAME.
For completeness, a fourth case (!tree_same && !tree_changed), which
would be triggered by commits whose parents are all classified as
REV_TREE_NEW.  That's another corner case for sure, but the old code
would mark it TREESAME and your patch changes that.
Ugh, forget this part, I failed to notice the /* fallthrough */ at the
end of the REV_TREE_NEW case..

René
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help