Re: Re: Updating a submodule with a compatible version from another submodule version using the parent meta-repository
From: Heiko Voigt <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:50:28
Hi, On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 02:05:43PM -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote:
If that version of submodule B is explicitly bound to a commit in the superproject A, you know which version of A and C were recorded, and the problem is solved.
[...]
If you are confident that you didn't introduce different kind of dependency to other submodules while developing your "old_feature" branch in submodule B, one strategy may be to find an ancestor, preferrably the fork point, of your "old_feature" branch that is bound to the superproject A. Then at that point at least you know whoever made that commit in A tested the combination of what was recorded in that commit, together with the version of B and C, and you can go forward from there, replaying the changes you made to the "old_feature" branch in submodule B.
Lets extend your explanation a little further and maybe demonstrate the problem
Julian is having a little more. I think what Julian searches for is a tool in
git that does the lookup for you which is AFAIK not that easy currently. It
seems to be a quite useful feature. Here what I understand Julian wants:
1. Find the most recent superproject commit X'' in A that records a submodule
commit X' in B which contains the commit X in B you are searching for.
For this we would need use something similar to git describe --contains
but instead of using the list of existing tags in B it should use the list
of commits in B which are recorded in A.
Here a drawing to explain (linear history for simplicity):
superproject A:
O---O---X''---O
\
submodule B: \
\
O---X---O---X'---O---O
2. Look up the commit of C which is recorded in X'' of A and check it
out.
Step 2 is easy but for Step 1 the lookup of X' is missing for the commandline.
Is there already anything that implements git describe --contains for a defined
list of commits instead of refs?
Cheers Heiko